High stakes: LNG and the Legislature
Document Actions
Suppose you had one month to address Oregon's biggest challenges, from
raising education standards to maintaining our competitiveness in the
increasingly crowded green economy. This month the Oregon Legislature
has just such a chance before it, as lawmakers meet in a special
session.
Given the stakes, you'd hope legislators would use
the limited time of the special session to make concrete deliverables
in the realms of education, economic vitality and environmental
safeguards. You might not want your elected officials devoting the
session to a resurrected version of a bill that failed to pass in 2009,
and which redefines the language in relatively obscure land-use codes.
But
then, you probably haven't given thousands of dollars' worth of
campaign contributions to your legislators. You're not Northwest
Natural Gas.
Last year, House Bill 3058 failed in the Oregon
Senate, but managed to make a name for several legislators as allies of
the controversial liquefied natural gas industry. Dubbed the LNG
fast-track bill by environmentalists and landowners, it would have
speeded up the process by which LNG companies and other corporations
apply for permits to begin environmentally destructive work on private
land.
HB 3058 went down in flames, but not before The
Oregonian published an investigation of the gas industry's power in
politics, reporting that Northwest Natural donated $210,000 to
political candidates since the beginning of 2008. With the Legislature
poised to take up a new version of the LNG fast-track Bill this month,
it's time to ask just how long the gas industry will be allowed to
guide Oregon politics.
-Like last year's fast-track bill, this
month's Senate Bill 1020 has been presented as unrelated to LNG. Yet
the truth is SB 1020 is a windfall to the LNG industry and would
directly benefit Northwest Natural. Along with out-of-state energy
giant TransCanada, Northwest Natural is backing the controversial
Palomar LNG pipeline through Oregon. With environmental and land-
rights activists opposed to the project, the future of Palomar is far
from certain. SB 1020 could give it a shot of adrenaline. With big
money sitting on the outcome, the gas industry has set its sights on
passing an LNG fast-track bill.
As a member of the steering
committee for the Northwest Natural Accountability Project, I'm
concerned about the company's undue influence in politics. Through the
project's "Hey! NW Natural" campaign, environmentalists, landowners,
students and stakeholders are pushing Northwest Natural to protect the
interests of its customers, who are adversely affected when a corporate
lobby decides which bills the Legislature takes seriously. In the wake
of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that corporations can give unlimited
funds directly to political candidates, this cause has become all the
more important.
So as lawmakers assemble for the special
session, take a moment to ask yourself who your elected officials are
representing. They should be serving you and the countless other
Oregonians who voted them into office. Anyone got $210,000?
Nick Engelfried lives in Hillsboro.
